Postaus
Bk_2.0
Bk_2.0
This is a real # $BTC risk-off flush, but far from a ETF-exodus signal. Historically, one ugly ETF outflow print matters less for B $BTC than whether it turns into a ongoing series of strong negative prints. Now, the headline number is big (-$630.4m, led by #IBIT -$284.7m, #FBTC $133.2m, #ARKB $177.1m, and #BITB -$35.4m). And that followed more ETF outflows on May 7, 8, and 12. So the last five trading sessions net out to about $1.25bn. But "biggest since January" also needs context. Since launch, U.S. spot $BTC ETFs still show around $58.5bn cumulative net inflows, with an average daily net inflow near $100m. So while a -$630m day is nasty (about 6x the average daily inflow), it is not "institutions just abandoned Bitcoin". The all-time worst daily ETF outflow was actually about - $1.11bn (Feb 25, 2025), so while this is large, it's far from not unprecedented. So why the dump? Hot macro hit exactly as B $BTC was trying to hold the $80k area. U.S. CPI rose 3.8% year-on-year in April, with energy 17.9%, and PPI then came in even uglier: fin demand producer prices rose 1.4% month-on-month and 20% year-o year. That hurts therate cuts soon, liquidity back, BTC go brrr" narrative. But the new narrative looks more like a pause than a dump. So $BTC probably doesn't go anywhere fast. So far, we only have three negative prints, not a sustained, ongoing series of red nukes (which will be a problem). But so far, we only have enough for a pause. be ready for 📉📉

Vastuuvapauslauseke: OKX Orbit -sisältö on tarkoitettu ainoastaan tiedotustarkoituksiin. Lisätietoja

Vastaukset

Ei vielä kommentteja. Ole ensimmäinen vastaaja!